AI Registry™
Inventory AI systems, models, applications, agents, vendors, owners, status, and business context.
Create a living governance record for every AI system—connecting context, risk, human authorization, controls, validation, evidence, remediation, and monitoring.
Production use · High impact · Human decision support
Authorization conditionComplete subgroup performance review before expanded deployment.
Controls reflect the system’s purpose, impact, users, and regulated environment.
Assessments remain connected to validation, artifacts, rationale, and approvals.
Material change and operational signals can trigger renewed governance action.
The SR2 capability system
SR2 is being developed as a modular platform. The architecture below represents intended capability; availability will be confirmed as modules reach pilot and production readiness.
Inventory AI systems, models, applications, agents, vendors, owners, status, and business context.
Capture intended use, users, affected people, data, autonomy, decision impact, and deployment context.
Apply repeatable risk logic while preserving the context that makes each system different.
Connect requirements, test plans, results, exceptions, conclusions, and approval.
Turn missing controls and evidence into assigned, time-bound corrective work.
Maintain the artifacts and decision history needed to explain and defend governance outcomes.
Use performance, change, incident, and control signals to initiate reassessment.
The Governance Case™
Instead of scattering governance across tickets, spreadsheets, policies, and meeting notes, SR2 is designed to preserve the complete reasoning chain.
What the AI does, where it operates, and who it can affect.
What can go wrong, how serious it is, and who owns it.
What safeguards, oversight, and limits are required.
What demonstrates that requirements and controls are satisfied.
Who authorized use, under which conditions, and why.
What must be monitored and what triggers intervention.
Designed for regulated depth
This is the planned SmartRisk distinction: broad AI oversight anchored in the risks, quality controls, validation, and lifecycle records that regulated teams already manage.
Portfolio visibility, policies, ownership, risk tiers, approvals, and executive reporting.
Domain-specific controls and evidence for medical devices, life sciences, and healthcare.
Detailed hazards, failure modes, controls, validation, and residual risk connected from SR1.
Initial specialization
The first vertical focus connects enterprise AI governance to medical-device risk management, design controls, validation, change control, human oversight, postmarket monitoring, CAPA, and regulatory evidence.
Expansion path: Pharmaceutical & Biotech AI Governance™, Clinical Research AI Governance™, and Healthcare Delivery AI Governance™ will require dedicated domain packs built on SR2 Core.
SR2 is in active development. The AI Registry, AI Profile, Risk Engine, governance, validation, evidence, remediation, and monitoring capabilities will mature in stages. Demonstrations and proposals will identify which functions are available, piloting, or planned.
AvailableReady for demonstrated use
PilotControlled validation with design partners
PlannedApproved product direction
Help shape the operating layer
Discuss your governance model, regulated use case, or interest in becoming an SR2 design partner.